<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Good of Affluence: A Critique and Evaluation of Capitalism 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.novuslumen.net/the-good-of-affluence-a-critique-and-evaluation-of-capitalism-1/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.novuslumen.net/the-good-of-affluence-a-critique-and-evaluation-of-capitalism-1</link>
	<description>I write within the tension of spirituality and culture, politics and theology, existing and emerging forms of church, the Kingdom of God and Empire America, modern and postmodern thought, &#38; the gritty drama that is my pilgrim story.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:25:41 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joel Shaffer</title>
		<link>http://www.novuslumen.net/the-good-of-affluence-a-critique-and-evaluation-of-capitalism-1/comment-page-1#comment-43383</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Shaffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.novuslumen.net/the-good-of-affluence-a-critique-and-evaluation-of-capitalism-1#comment-43383</guid>
		<description>Jeremy,

Great topic and a great intro.  I am looking forward to reading and digesting each segment that you post.  This is quite a touchy subject that needs to be dealt with among evangelical Christians.  Even though many evangelicals are still quite defensive about capitalism, at least nowadays I feel you can actually have an good discussion about it.  I remember some fifteen years ago raising questions about some of capitalism&#039;s flaws and being labeled a &quot;neo-evangelical.&quot;   A few even questioned whether I had abandoned the true gospel for a social one.  Sigh...... And I happen to be more for free-market than a controlled market.  

  At least nowadays people in my Baptist church aren&#039;t ready to stone me for  questioning their sacred cow.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy,</p>
<p>Great topic and a great intro.  I am looking forward to reading and digesting each segment that you post.  This is quite a touchy subject that needs to be dealt with among evangelical Christians.  Even though many evangelicals are still quite defensive about capitalism, at least nowadays I feel you can actually have an good discussion about it.  I remember some fifteen years ago raising questions about some of capitalism&#8217;s flaws and being labeled a &#8220;neo-evangelical.&#8221;   A few even questioned whether I had abandoned the true gospel for a social one.  Sigh&#8230;&#8230; And I happen to be more for free-market than a controlled market.  </p>
<p>  At least nowadays people in my Baptist church aren&#8217;t ready to stone me for  questioning their sacred cow&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thewanderer</title>
		<link>http://www.novuslumen.net/the-good-of-affluence-a-critique-and-evaluation-of-capitalism-1/comment-page-1#comment-42992</link>
		<dc:creator>thewanderer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 17:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.novuslumen.net/the-good-of-affluence-a-critique-and-evaluation-of-capitalism-1#comment-42992</guid>
		<description>&quot;While I agree capitalism in its basic rendition is the best economic system for creating economically and socially stable nations...&quot;

Why?  It could be argued that socialism is much more stable, albeit dictatorial in practice, and was simply hampered by the intrusion of the instabilities of the free-market system upon their attempts at forging a new path.

I&#039;d be much more inclined to agree that capitalism is the best economic system to achieve a secular humanistic sense of justice.  But more stable?  I doubt it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;While I agree capitalism in its basic rendition is the best economic system for creating economically and socially stable nations&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Why?  It could be argued that socialism is much more stable, albeit dictatorial in practice, and was simply hampered by the intrusion of the instabilities of the free-market system upon their attempts at forging a new path.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be much more inclined to agree that capitalism is the best economic system to achieve a secular humanistic sense of justice.  But more stable?  I doubt it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
